<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There&#8217;s Nothing Philanthropic about a Social Stock Exchange</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xchangexchange.com/blog1/index.php/2007/11/04/theres-nothing-philanthropic-about-a-social-stock-exchange/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xchangexchange.com/blog1/2007/11/04/theres-nothing-philanthropic-about-a-social-stock-exchange/</link>
	<description>An exploration about social stock exchanges</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 03:56:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean Stannard-Stockton</title>
		<link>http://xchangexchange.com/blog1/2007/11/04/theres-nothing-philanthropic-about-a-social-stock-exchange/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Stannard-Stockton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 00:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xchangexchange.com/blog1/2007/11/04/theres-nothing-philanthropic-about-a-social-stock-exchange/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>My take is that relating &quot;giving&quot; to &quot;social good&quot; confuses inputs with outputs. There are only two relevant outputs, social value and financial value (or &quot;personal value&quot;). The input to get those are time, money and intellectual capital.

Giving a &quot;donation&quot; to a politician might be done to create social value or to create personal value. Investing dollars into a for-profit startup might be done to create social value or personal value. Both inputs are likely to create a combination of personal and social value outputs.

Most people think that investment-like inputs must only create personal value and that philanthropy-like inputs must only create social value. I think the key framing issue to the developing social capital markets is understanding that the full range of input-types can be used in the quest to create social value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My take is that relating &#8220;giving&#8221; to &#8220;social good&#8221; confuses inputs with outputs. There are only two relevant outputs, social value and financial value (or &#8220;personal value&#8221;). The input to get those are time, money and intellectual capital.</p>
<p>Giving a &#8220;donation&#8221; to a politician might be done to create social value or to create personal value. Investing dollars into a for-profit startup might be done to create social value or personal value. Both inputs are likely to create a combination of personal and social value outputs.</p>
<p>Most people think that investment-like inputs must only create personal value and that philanthropy-like inputs must only create social value. I think the key framing issue to the developing social capital markets is understanding that the full range of input-types can be used in the quest to create social value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucy Bernholz</title>
		<link>http://xchangexchange.com/blog1/2007/11/04/theres-nothing-philanthropic-about-a-social-stock-exchange/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucy Bernholz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 23:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xchangexchange.com/blog1/2007/11/04/theres-nothing-philanthropic-about-a-social-stock-exchange/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Some of the other sources of capital for social good include community development loan funds, social venture capital, social private equity, fair trade investments, co-op structures, community venture capital...The trick is to first identify the sources, find values for each source, then add. Philanthropy - grant dollars - would be in the mix. Some of the invested corpus might also, to the degree it is invested with mission-related ROI goals. Here&#039;s the kicker - most of philanthropy - 95% or more of the $600 billion in endowed assets (US only) would not be included, at least not as it is used in its present form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the other sources of capital for social good include community development loan funds, social venture capital, social private equity, fair trade investments, co-op structures, community venture capital&#8230;The trick is to first identify the sources, find values for each source, then add. Philanthropy &#8211; grant dollars &#8211; would be in the mix. Some of the invested corpus might also, to the degree it is invested with mission-related ROI goals. Here&#8217;s the kicker &#8211; most of philanthropy &#8211; 95% or more of the $600 billion in endowed assets (US only) would not be included, at least not as it is used in its present form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.574 seconds -->
