While I know this story has gotten a lot of mentions already (I caught it several times in my various emails and blogs), I thought it was good to include here as well because it speaks to some of the trends we’ve been following and the questions we’ve been asking. For example, the emergence of ‘nonprofit IPOs’ raises interesting questions about ‘exits’ — and not as much for the orginal investors (as there are no returns and no return of capital with a nonprofit investment) — but rather for the nonprofit organization.. If Do Something successfully raises $8MM in its IPO and doubles its activities by 2011 – could a foundation then act as the sole investor for the ‘next round’ – after the initial IPO holders have made the “riskier” first investments??
But back to the article.. In some ways, the Do Something IPO is very similar to the one run by Homeward Bound in CA which we discussed here last spring. It is also similar to the ‘growth capital’ campaigns run by organizations such as Teach for America, College Summit, and Volunteer Match (some with the help of people like Chuck Harris (Seachange) and George Overholser (NFF Capital Partners). In those cases, the accountability reporting is integral to the deal – and George Overholser specifically has written on both this type of capital raising and the accounting (their process/system is called SEGUE). He also wrote a great piece on ‘buy vs build capital’ for nonprofits which is well worth the read.
One final note: this article made reference at the end to “joint stock philanthropy in 18th century England”, which I of course had to Google to see what this was about.. In doing saw, I saw it referenced in a talk on philanthrocapitalism year with Matthew Bishop (Economist) who – while discussing his upcoming book with Michael Green (Department for International Development) – notes that there have been golden waves of philanthropy (we’re in the 5th) in which the philanthropy practices of the day mirrored the business practices of the day (and thus in 18th century England there was a joint stock philanthropy practice… although those “stock owners” actually had voting rights (I need to learn more on this)). Their book comes out soon on Amazon. Enjoy…
]]>Grecco notes how BVS&A - and like exchanges – are helping to meet the deep needs of investor/donors for “order and transparency”. Due to the strong vetting process, the BVS&A provides a true “seal of quality” for listed nonprofits. The online platform for donating and reporting greatly increases the transparency of process and results for donors. As we are increasingly hearing these same needs for ”order and transparency” articulated in many of the initiatives focused on developing a social capital marketplace – the BVS&A does demonstrate the power of meeting these needs effectively. In fact, two examples from the article demonstrate well the value in linking donor capital with organizations in need. One story shows how initial seed funds acquired through the exchange helped a local solution (Viva Rio) grow to actually become part of public policy and replicate in 14 states in Brazil. Another discusses a new project on solar lamps that will both cut energy costs and reduce the carbon footprints of shrimp farmers.. Innovative ideas getting important accces to capital through a trusted source providing order and transparency – good news!
]]>In developing its exchange platform, Altrustiq is thinking through challenges such as how to create an added value to ‘owning’ a share in a nonprofit – as opposed to just donating in a traditional way (another challenge it is debating is creating liquidity, but more on that later…)
To this idea of the added value of owning a ’stock’ in a nonprofit – there are some real thoughtful people investigating ways to change the beneficiary-grantee dynamic and move towards an ‘exchange of value’ dynamic – which is at the heart of any exchange. On this topic, I had an interesting conversation with Paul Fordham of the nonprofit group Homeward Bound about a unique “IPO” campaign they have been running (Paul also sent me some great collateral materials on the program – including a copy of an IPO share certificate).
For Homeward Bound, IPO represents an “immediate public opportunity” to end homelessness - and it was launched as part of their capital campaign in 2007 (Warren Buffet was one of their first investors). While clearly in some ways it is a creative ‘twist’ on traditional fundraising – I think it also demonstrates this idea of communicating in a meaningful way to donors an “exchange of value”. Homeward bound developed some interesting metrics on the ROI for puchaasing one of their IPOs – with returns defined for the organization, its beneficiaries – and the donors themselves (things like special event invites, PR, etc..) - AND - specific “shareholder reports” on metrics achieved…
Interesting model… more at www.ipohomeward.com
]]>